Regional families
Pimentel – Enríquez – Lemos
One regional research tree with separate branches. The case names Luis de Armada Pimentel, his wife Mariana, the dean Gonzalo and the presbyter Carlos. Their bridge to Diego is unknown. The advocate’s parentage allegations remain allegations. The published pedigree reports Carlos Suárez de Deza and Apolonia’s marriage in 1647; its original records have not been examined. It is not proved that these people are the case’s Carlos, Polonia and Diego, or the founders “Carlos y Polonia de Lemos”. The two generations named Diego remain distinct. Conflicting dates and a Pedro/Carlos discrepancy are recorded in the notes. No connection to our personal Álvarez tree is established.
Explore
Regional research is separate from our own family tree. A common surname, trade or place does not establish kinship or religious status.
Family reconstruction
One regional research tree with separate branches. The case names Luis de Armada Pimentel, his wife Mariana, the dean Gonzalo and the presbyter Carlos. Their bridge to Diego is unknown. The advocate’s parentage allegations remain allegations. The published pedigree reports Carlos Suárez de Deza and Apolonia’s marriage in 1647; its original records have not been examined. It is not proved that these people are the case’s Carlos, Polonia and Diego, or the founders “Carlos y Polonia de Lemos”. The two generations named Diego remain distinct. Conflicting dates and a Pedro/Carlos discrepancy are recorded in the notes. No connection to our personal Álvarez tree is established.
Claims & citations
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Fernando IV de Castilla as a parent of Rey Alfonso XI de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Constanza de Portugal as a parent of Rey Alfonso XI de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Pedro Núñez de Guzmán as a parent of Leonor de Guzmán.
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Sancho IV de Castilla as a parent of Rey Fernando IV de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives María de Molina as a parent of Rey Fernando IV de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Rei Dinis I de Portugal as a parent of Constanza de Portugal.
Salazar y Acha gives Isabel de Aragón as a parent of Constanza de Portugal.
Lamigueiro names Don Jorge Arias Varela e Quiroga as a parent of Don Carlos Suárez de Deza e Losada. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Doña Ana Losada e Ribadeneira as a parent of Don Carlos Suárez de Deza e Losada. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Don Diego de Eebra e Pimentel as a parent of Doña Apolonia de Eebra Osorio e Pimentel. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Doña Juana Osorio Bolaño e Estrada as a parent of Doña Apolonia de Eebra Osorio e Pimentel. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Don Pedro Suárez de Deza as a parent of Don Jorge Arias Varela e Quiroga. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Doña Catalina Sotelo de Rivera as a parent of Don Jorge Arias Varela e Quiroga. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Don Juan Losada e Ribadeneira as a parent of Doña Ana Losada e Ribadeneira. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Doña Ana Enríquez e Sarmiento de Cadórniga as a parent of Doña Ana Losada e Ribadeneira. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Don Carlos Suárez de Deza e Losada as a parent of Don Diego Suárez de Deza Eebra e Pimentel. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Doña Apolonia de Eebra Osorio e Pimentel as a parent of Don Diego Suárez de Deza Eebra e Pimentel. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Don Carlos Suárez de Deza e Losada as a parent of Doña Juana de Eebra e Pimentel. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Doña Apolonia de Eebra Osorio e Pimentel as a parent of Doña Juana de Eebra e Pimentel. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Don Diego Suárez de Deza Eebra e Pimentel as a parent of Doña Ángela de Eebra Pimentel Osorio. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Doña Antonia Osorio de Maiorga as a parent of Doña Ángela de Eebra Pimentel Osorio. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Don Juan Manuel Enríquez e Losada as a parent of Don Álvaro Enríquez de Losada. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro names Doña Juana de Eebra e Pimentel as a parent of Don Álvaro Enríquez de Losada. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro states that Don Carlos Suárez de Deza e Losada married Doña Apolonia de Eebra Osorio e Pimentel. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro states that Don Jorge Arias Varela e Quiroga married Doña Ana Losada e Ribadeneira. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro states that Don Pedro Suárez de Deza married Doña Catalina Sotelo de Rivera. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro states that Don Diego Suárez de Deza Eebra e Pimentel married Doña Antonia Osorio de Maiorga. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro states that Doña Juana de Eebra e Pimentel married Don Juan Manuel Enríquez e Losada. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Lamigueiro states that Doña Ángela de Eebra Pimentel Osorio married Don Álvaro Enríquez de Losada. Candidate relationship from a published genealogy; original records have not been checked.
Possible identification across sources, not proved: the names and reported family cluster invite comparison, but the published person and the 1681 occurrence remain separate. This is not an additional parentage link.
Possible identification across sources, not proved: the names and reported family cluster invite comparison, but the published person and the 1681 occurrence remain separate. This is not an additional parentage link.
Possible identification across sources, not proved: the names and reported family cluster invite comparison, but the published person and the 1681 occurrence remain separate. This is not an additional parentage link.
Proposed match for drawing the published family from the litigation person; the source identities remain separate and identification is unproved.
Proposed match for drawing the published family from the litigation person; the source identities remain separate and identification is unproved.
Proposed match for drawing the published family from the litigation person; the source identities remain separate and identification is unproved.
The lawyer alleges Diego’s legitimate eldest-son status; no genealogical judgment is certified. The catalogue’s founders “Carlos y Polonia de Lemos” are not securely identified with his alleged parents. No demonstrated family bridge joins Diego to Luis, Mariana, the dean or the presbyter Carlos. Older Diego, Apolonia’s father in the published pedigree, is a separate generation from her son.
Carlos’s chronology conflicts across secondary references: Lamigueiro gives a death in 1654, while the Geneall discussion reports a testament in 1675. Neither is used as his life date. The son Diego’s 1650–1725 range is explicitly attributed to Lamigueiro.
Corga 11 calls Francisco de Yebra and Petronila de Tallobe’s son Carlos a grandson of Pedro Suárez de Deza and Polonia de Yebra; Lamigueiro instead places Francisco under Carlos and Apolonia. The Pedro/Carlos discrepancy remains unresolved and does not justify merging the litigation identities.
The 1681 litigant Gonzalo de Armada Araujo and the published study’s Gonzalo de Armada y Araujo share the distinctive office of dean and canon of Ourense and fit the 1646–1683 tenure. Their association is a candidate across sources. It establishes no family bridge to the other litigants.
Hervella identifies Juan de Armada y Araujo as the dean Gonzalo’s brother, citing a 1672 power of attorney. Shared parents are not supplied.
In his 1661 testament, as quoted by Hervella, Gonzalo de Armada y Araujo acknowledges Don Luis Antonio de Armada y Losada y Araúxo as his child. The mother is unnamed.
In his 1661 testament, as quoted by Hervella, Gonzalo de Armada y Araujo acknowledges Don José de Armada y Losada y Araúxo as his child. The mother is unnamed.
In his 1661 testament, as quoted by Hervella, Gonzalo de Armada y Araujo acknowledges Don Francisco de Armada y Losada y Araúxo as his child. The mother is unnamed.
In his 1661 testament, as quoted by Hervella, Gonzalo de Armada y Araujo acknowledges Doña Bernarda de Armada as his child. The mother is unnamed.
In his 1661 testament, as quoted by Hervella, Gonzalo de Armada y Araujo acknowledges Doña Francisca de Armada as his child. The mother is unnamed.
In his 1661 testament, as quoted by Hervella, Gonzalo de Armada y Araujo acknowledges Doña Úrsula de Armada as his child. The mother is unnamed.
Six children are explicitly acknowledged in the quoted testament. Their mother or mothers are unknown. Luis Antonio is not identified with the litigant Luis de Armada Pimentel; neither Mariana de Armada nor the presbyter Carlos is attached to this branch.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Don Antonio de Yebra y Losada → Don Diego de Eebra e Pimentel.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Doña Inés Pimentel Ribadeneira → Don Diego de Eebra e Pimentel.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Don Pedro Bolaño Ribadeneira → Doña Juana Osorio Bolaño e Estrada.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Doña Francisca Osorio Estrada → Doña Juana Osorio Bolaño e Estrada.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Don Álvaro Vázquez de Sampayo → Doña Inés Pimentel Ribadeneira.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Doña Ana Pimentel Ribadeneira → Doña Inés Pimentel Ribadeneira.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Don Fernán Díaz de Ribadeneira → Doña Ana Pimentel Ribadeneira.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Doña María Pimentel Cabeza de Vaca → Doña Ana Pimentel Ribadeneira.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Don Pedro de Bolaño Ribadeneira → Don Fernán Díaz de Ribadeneira.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Doña Beatriz de Castro → Don Fernán Díaz de Ribadeneira.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Don Pedro Pardo de Cela → Doña Beatriz de Castro.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Doña Isabel de Castro → Doña Beatriz de Castro.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Don Pedro Álvarez Osorio · Lemos → Doña Isabel de Castro. Isabel de Castro, wife of Pardo de Cela: the proposed parents Pedro Álvarez Osorio and Beatriz Enríquez lack contemporary documentary proof. This Enríquez route remains disputed.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Doña Beatriz Enríquez de Castro → Doña Isabel de Castro. Isabel de Castro, wife of Pardo de Cela: the proposed parents Pedro Álvarez Osorio and Beatriz Enríquez lack contemporary documentary proof. This Enríquez route remains disputed.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Don Pedro Enríquez · Trastámara → Doña Beatriz Enríquez de Castro.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Doña Isabel de Castro · Lemos → Doña Beatriz Enríquez de Castro.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Don Juan Rodríguez Pimentel → Doña María Pimentel Cabeza de Vaca.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Doña Blanca Cabeza de Vaca → Doña María Pimentel Cabeza de Vaca.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Don Álvaro González de Ribadeneira → Don Pedro Bolaño Ribadeneira.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Doña Beatriz de Castro · a moza → Don Pedro Bolaño Ribadeneira.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Don Juan López Pardo de Haro → Doña Beatriz de Castro · a moza.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Doña Beatriz de Castro · a vella → Doña Beatriz de Castro · a moza.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Don Fernán Díaz de Ribadeneira → Doña Beatriz de Castro · a vella.
Candidate parentage from the cited genealogy: Doña María Pimentel Cabeza de Vaca → Doña Beatriz de Castro · a vella.
Marriage reported in the cited genealogy: Don Antonio de Yebra y Losada × Doña Inés Pimentel Ribadeneira.
Marriage reported in the cited genealogy: Don Pedro Bolaño Ribadeneira × Doña Francisca Osorio Estrada.
Marriage reported in the cited genealogy: Doña Ana Pimentel Ribadeneira × Don Álvaro Vázquez de Sampayo.
Marriage reported in the cited genealogy: Don Fernán Díaz de Ribadeneira × Doña María Pimentel Cabeza de Vaca.
Marriage reported in the cited genealogy: Don Pedro de Bolaño Ribadeneira × Doña Beatriz de Castro.
Marriage reported in the cited genealogy: Don Pedro Pardo de Cela × Doña Isabel de Castro.
Marriage reported in the cited genealogy: Doña Beatriz Enríquez de Castro × Don Pedro Álvarez Osorio · Lemos.
Marriage reported in the cited genealogy: Don Pedro Enríquez · Trastámara × Doña Isabel de Castro · Lemos.
Marriage reported in the cited genealogy: Don Juan Rodríguez Pimentel × Doña Blanca Cabeza de Vaca.
Marriage reported in the cited genealogy: Don Álvaro González de Ribadeneira × Doña Beatriz de Castro · a moza.
Marriage reported in the cited genealogy: Don Juan López Pardo de Haro × Doña Beatriz de Castro · a vella.
Isabel de Castro, wife of Pardo de Cela: the proposed parents Pedro Álvarez Osorio and Beatriz Enríquez lack contemporary documentary proof. This Enríquez route remains disputed.
The 2000–2001 collateral Pimentel pedigree is challenged by Fernández del Hoyo’s 2007 study of the 1505 testament. Older parentage remains contested; the proposed Enríquez identification is not established.
The younger Pedro Bolaño, proposed father of Juana Osorio, and the older Pedro Bolaño, father of Fernán Díaz, are different generations and retain separate identities.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Juan Pimentel Rodríguez → Doña Ana María Pimentel Cabeza de Vaca.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Doña Blanca Cabeza de Vaca → Doña Ana María Pimentel Cabeza de Vaca.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Juan Alfonso Rodríguez Pimentel · Ribera → Don Juan Pimentel Rodríguez.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Doña Inés Osorio → Don Juan Pimentel Rodríguez.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Juan Alonso Pimentel Pacheco · II duque de Benavente → Don Juan Alfonso Rodríguez Pimentel · Ribera.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Doña Ana de Herrera y Velasco → Don Juan Alfonso Rodríguez Pimentel · Ribera.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Álvar Pérez Osorio · I duque de Aguiar → Doña Inés Osorio.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Doña Leonor Enríquez de Quiñones → Doña Inés Osorio.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Rodrigo Alonso Pimentel · IV conde de Benavente → Don Juan Alonso Pimentel Pacheco · II duque de Benavente.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Doña María Luisa Pacheco → Don Juan Alonso Pimentel Pacheco · II duque de Benavente.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Fadrique Enríquez · almirante → Doña Leonor Enríquez de Quiñones.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Doña Teresa Fernández de Quiñones → Doña Leonor Enríquez de Quiñones.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Alonso Enríquez de Castilla → Don Fadrique Enríquez · almirante.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Doña Juana de Mendoza → Don Fadrique Enríquez · almirante.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Infante Fadrique Alfonso → Don Alonso Enríquez de Castilla.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Paloma ibn Yahya → Don Alonso Enríquez de Castilla.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Fernán Pérez Ponce de León → Doña Juana Ponce de León.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Doña Urraca Gutiérrez de Meneses → Doña Juana Ponce de León.
Candidate marriage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Juan Pimentel Rodríguez × Doña Blanca Cabeza de Vaca.
Candidate marriage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Juan Alfonso Rodríguez Pimentel · Ribera × Doña Inés Osorio.
Candidate marriage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Juan Alonso Pimentel Pacheco · II duque de Benavente × Doña Ana de Herrera y Velasco.
Candidate marriage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Álvar Pérez Osorio · I duque de Aguiar × Doña Leonor Enríquez de Quiñones.
Candidate marriage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Fadrique Enríquez · almirante × Doña Teresa Fernández de Quiñones.
Candidate marriage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Alonso Enríquez de Castilla × Doña Juana de Mendoza.
Candidate marriage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Rodrigo Alonso Pimentel · IV conde de Benavente × Doña María Luisa Pacheco.
Identification unresolved: this proposed Ana María is not merged with María Pimentel, married to Fernán Díaz in November 1503. The image’s c.1540 father conflicts chronologically, and its Juan pedigree differs from the 1505 testament studied in 2007.
This reference branch illustrates the proposed Pimentel–Osorio–Enríquez route. Every parent and marriage link remains a candidate; cited publications and catalogue metadata supplement the upper generations. The 1503 marriage and 1505 testament prevent establishing its Juan and María as the documented couple. No image dates are assigned as life dates.
Proposed parents differ from Blanca’s husband’s 1505 testament, which names Juan Pimentel and Catalina de Porras.
The supplied trees propose this Pimentel–Osorio–Enríquez ancestry. Identification with María’s father is disputed: c.1540 conflicts with her 1503 marriage, and the 1505 testament names different parents.
Salazar y Acha identifies Alfonso XI and Leonor de Guzmán as the parents of Infante Fadrique Alfonso. These upper royal facts do not verify the disputed downstream Pimentel identification.
Salazar y Acha identifies Alfonso XI and Leonor de Guzmán as the parents of Infante Fadrique Alfonso. These upper royal facts do not verify the disputed downstream Pimentel identification.
Candidate parentage from the cited reference pedigree: Don Álvaro Pérez de Guzmán → Pedro Núñez de Guzmán.
The image proposes Juana Ponce de León as Leonor de Guzmán’s mother. Salazar y Acha says the mother’s name is unknown and the Ponce identification only possible. The proposed Juana’s parents do not establish Leonor’s maternal ancestry.
She is displayed as Paloma ibn Yahya following the family correction. Salazar y Acha discusses the Paloma tradition but says Alonso’s mother’s name is unknown; her full surname and parents are not established by the cited scholarship. The family identifies her father as Gedaliah ibn Yahya; this parentage remains a family attribution.
The image proposes Juana Ponce de León as Leonor de Guzmán’s mother. Salazar y Acha says the mother’s name is unknown and the Ponce identification only possible. The proposed Juana’s parents do not establish Leonor’s maternal ancestry.
Candidate parentage reported in the Mauro family abstract: Doña Ana Enríquez → Don Mauro de Losada Quiroga y Enríquez.
Candidate parentage reported in the Mauro family abstract: Don Juan de Losada Quiroga → Don Mauro de Losada Quiroga y Enríquez.
Candidate parentage reported in the Mauro family abstract: Don Benito Enríquez → Doña Ana Enríquez.
Candidate parentage reported in the Mauro family abstract: Doña Berenguela de Cadórniga → Doña Ana Enríquez.
The couple’s names and Cadórniga context suggest an Ayala–Lamigueiro match, without proving identity. Source occurrences remain separate.
The couple’s names and Cadórniga context suggest an Ayala–Lamigueiro match, without proving identity. Source occurrences remain separate.
The couple’s names and Cadórniga context suggest an Ayala–Lamigueiro match, without proving identity. Source occurrences remain separate.
The couple’s names and Cadórniga context suggest an Ayala–Lamigueiro match, without proving identity. Source occurrences remain separate.
The proposed ancestry stops at Benito and Berenguela. This source does not establish their parents or a connection to the royal Enríquez family.
Salazar y Acha identifies Infante Fadrique Alfonso as a parent of Don Pedro Enríquez · Trastámara. Published genealogy; the disputed descent through Pardo de Cela’s wife is not thereby verified.
Salazar y Acha identifies Doña Constanza de Angulo as a parent of Don Pedro Enríquez · Trastámara. Published genealogy; the disputed descent through Pardo de Cela’s wife is not thereby verified.
Salazar y Acha identifies Don Lope Alfonso de Angulo as a parent of Doña Constanza de Angulo. Published genealogy; the disputed descent through Pardo de Cela’s wife is not thereby verified.
Salazar y Acha identifies Doña Elvira Díaz de Aguayo as a parent of Doña Constanza de Angulo. Published genealogy; the disputed descent through Pardo de Cela’s wife is not thereby verified.
Salazar y Acha identifies Don Álvaro de Castro · Arroyolos as a parent of Doña Isabel de Castro · Lemos. Published genealogy; the disputed descent through Pardo de Cela’s wife is not thereby verified.
Salazar y Acha identifies Doña María Ponce de León as a parent of Doña Isabel de Castro · Lemos. Published genealogy; the disputed descent through Pardo de Cela’s wife is not thereby verified.
Gedaliah ibn Yahya is identified as Paloma’s father in the family correction.
Carlos Suárez [reading] · alleged father of · Diego de Yebra Pimentel
Reading and evidence
- Source wording / normalized excerpt
- … la filiación de su parte, ser hijo legítimo y maior de Don Carlos Suárez y Doña Polonia Osorio de Yebra …
- Recorded role / assertion status
- normalized_partial_transcription advocate_lineage_allegation explicit_allegation_qualified_name
- Qualifications and limits
- The advocate alleges legitimate eldest-son status. No genealogical finding is certified.
Polonia Osorio de Yebra [reading] / Polonia de Lemos · alleged mother of · Diego de Yebra Pimentel
Reading and evidence
- Source wording / normalized excerpt
- … la filiación de su parte, ser hijo legítimo y maior de Don Carlos Suárez y Doña Polonia Osorio de Yebra …
- Recorded role / assertion status
- normalized_partial_transcription advocate_lineage_allegation explicit_allegation_qualified_name
- Qualifications and limits
- Maternal source forms require reconciliation. No genealogical finding is certified.
Luis de Armada Pimentel · spouse of · Mariana de Armada [given-name reading]
Reading and evidence
- Source wording / normalized excerpt
- D. Luis de Armada Pimentel, por lo que le toca como marido de Dª Mariana de Armada.
- Recorded role / assertion status
- normalized_partial_transcription procedural_capacity_statement explicit_role_spouse_given_name_qualified
- Qualifications and limits
- Undirected marriage meaning; source describes Luis as husband.
Record
Royal genealogy · Salazar y Acha (2021)
Jaime de Salazar y Acha, Las dinastías reales de España en la Edad Media, RAH/BOE, Madrid, 2021, ISBN 978-84-340-2781-7
Jaime de Salazar y Acha, Las dinastías reales de España en la Edad Media, RAH/BOE, 2021. Relevant genealogies and footnotes were reviewed in chapters VII, X and XI. This supports the added royal ancestry from Fadrique; it does not independently verify the supplied Geni links back from the Galician family. Leonor’s mother is not established. Paloma’s full identity is not established by this book.
Record
Suárez de Deza–Yebra pedigree · Lamigueiro (2006)
Xosé Lois Lamigueiro Fernández, “Suárez de Deza, Rodrigo (descendencia)”, Xenealoxía.org, 26 May 2006, generations V–IX
Xosé Lois Lamigueiro Fernández, “Suárez de Deza, Rodrigo (descendencia)”, Xenealoxía.org, 26 May 2006, generations V–IX. Secondary published genealogy, citing Mariñán, Pazos y Señoríos and A Heráldica nas Terras de Rianxo. Original records have not been inspected. Parentage and marriages are displayed as candidates attributed to this publication; its identities are not merged with the 1681 case.
Record
Yebra family comparison · Corga 11 (2024)
Carlos Álvarez Quiroga, Corga 11 (2024), pp. 6–13, p. 13 and note 20
Carlos Álvarez Quiroga, “Un exemplo da conflitividade pola terra no Corgo de principios do século XVIII”, Corga 11 (2024), pp. 6–13, especially p. 13 and note 20. Gives a 15 April 1706 marriage, citing ADL, San Salvador de Santalla Alta marriage register, and calls the groom a grandson of Pedro Suárez de Deza and Polonia de Yebra. The original register has not been checked; this differs from Carlos in Lamigueiro’s pedigree.
Record
Chronology comparison · Geneall discussion (2002–2006)
Geneall public discussion, “Genealogia Yebra y Oca Ulloa Ribadeneira”, 2002–2006; secondary research lead
Public discussion “Genealogia Yebra y Oca Ulloa Ribadeneira”, begun by Jacinto Bettencourt in 2002 and continued by Manuel Sarmento Pizarro in 2006. A research lead, not independent proof: its 1675 testament reference for Carlos conflicts with the 1654 death in Lamigueiro. Neither date is assigned here.
Record
Dean Armada’s family · José Hervella Vázquez
José Hervella Vázquez, En el Camino de Damasco: La conversión de San Pablo, tema escultórico de la Capilla de Armada en la Catedral de Orense, pp. 651–656; p. 652, notes 5 and 8
José Hervella Vázquez, En el Camino de Damasco: La conversión de San Pablo, tema escultórico de la Capilla de Armada en la Catedral de Orense, p. 652, notes 5 and 8. Quotes the dean’s 1661 testament (AHPOu, Roque Araujo, 1661, unnumbered folio) and a 1672 power (Diocesan Archive of Ourense, Juan de Puga, fol. 271). The originals have not been independently examined. Mothers are unnamed; no relationship to Luis de Armada Pimentel is established.
Record
Deans of Ourense · Leza Tello and Pérez Formoso (2018)
Prudencio Leza Tello & Pilar Pérez Formoso, Dignidades de la catedral de Ourense, Diversarum Rerum 13 (2018), p. 125
Prudencio Leza Tello and Pilar Pérez Formoso, Dignidades de la catedral de Ourense, Diversarum Rerum 13 (2018), p. 125. Lists Gonzalo de Armada y Araujo as dean from October 1646 until his death in October 1683. These are office and death dates, not a birth range.
Record
Geni · supplied comparison tree
Geni tree and supplied reference image; linked tree not inspected
Linked tree not inspected; the reference image supplies Apolonia’s proposed grandparents. These relationships remain research candidates.
Record
Yebra–Pimentel · external genealogy
Ernesto Álvarez Uriondo, Geneanet gentuc, Diego de Yebra Pimentel, parents and grandparents
The external genealogy names Antonio de Yebra López de Mayorga and Inés Pimentel Cabeza de Vaca as parents of the older Diego, and Álvaro Vázquez Sampayo and Ana Pimentel Ribadeneira as maternal grandparents. Its author says the tree is provisional. No original record proving these links has been inspected.
Record
Torés–Pimentel · El Pazo de Tovar study
Carlos Andrés González Paz, De la «torre de San Thomé de Lorenzana» al «Palacio de Tovar», in El Pazo de Tovar, CSIC, 2012, pp. 104–106, notes 84–91; publisher-distributor catalogue
González Paz’s CSIC study names Fernán Díaz de Ribadeneira and María Pimentel as parents of Ana Pimentel, wife of Álvaro Vázquez Sampayo, citing AHPO, Casa del Castro, caja 23618. It also gives Fernán’s parents and Pardo de Cela grandparents. The book was consulted through its public text reproduction; the cited manuscripts were not inspected. The older Lemos-count connection remains disputed.
Record
Torés · published Pazo de Oca chart
José M. Bértolo Ballesteros & Luís M. Ferro Pego, Pazo de Oca: estudo xenealóxico e heráldico, Nalgures X, 2014, printed p. 120, Torés chart (extract PDF p. 54)
The published chart supplies the two Beatriz de Castro generations, their husbands and the younger Pedro Bolaño–Francisca Osorio couple. It also repeats the traditional Lemos parentage of Isabel de Castro and an inaccurate Benavente-count attribution. Those points are qualified by the later scholarly correction and the RAMHG pedigree; the chart is not treated as proof of the whole route.
Record
Cabeza de Vaca · scholarly collateral pedigree
Javier Gómez de Olea y Bustinza & Pedro Moreno Meyerhoff, Los señores y marqueses de Fuentehoyuelo, Anales RAMHG VI, 2000–2001, pp. 98–99, notes 41–45
Gómez de Olea and Moreno Meyerhoff identify María Pimentel Cabeza de Vaca as daughter of Juan Rodríguez Pimentel and Blanca Cabeza de Vaca, married to Fernán Díaz in November 1503, citing RAH Salazar M-140. Their 2000–2001 collateral Pimentel pedigree is challenged by Fernández del Hoyo’s 2007 documentary study: the 1505 testament names Juan Pimentel and Catalina de Porras as Juan Rodríguez’s parents. The older ancestry is therefore contested, not a settled correction or proof of the proposed Enríquez route.
Record
Isabel de Castro · disputed Lemos parentage
Eduardo Pardo de Guevara y Valdés, De linajes, parentelas y grupos de poder, printed p. 505, editorial addition to note 84
Pardo de Guevara states that no contemporary document establishes Isabel de Castro, wife of Pardo de Cela, as daughter of the first counts of Lemos. He notes doubts following García Tato’s research. The traditional parents appear as a disputed proposal.
Record
Lemos–Enríquez genealogy · Salazar y Acha
Jaime de Salazar y Acha, Las dinastías reales de España en la Edad Media, RAH/BOE, 2021, printed pp. 330–332
Salazar y Acha identifies Beatriz de Castro, also known as Beatriz Enríquez, as daughter of Pedro Enríquez, count of Trastámara, and Isabel de Castro; she married Pedro Álvarez Osorio in 1433. This supports that couple and her parents, not the disputed step to Pardo de Cela’s wife. Pedro Enríquez is the count, not King Pedro I. Pages 330–331 name his parents Fadrique and Constanza de Angulo, Constanza’s parents, and Isabel’s parents Álvaro de Castro and María Ponce de León.
Record
Pimentel–Enríquez · supplied reference pedigree
Supplied Pimentel–Cabeza de Vaca–Osorio–Enríquez reference images; Geni trees 6000000011252943346 and 6000000052359095377 not inspected
Separate ancestry from the supplied reference images, including Geni trees 6000000011252943346 and 6000000052359095377. The linked trees were not inspected. Image names, titles and relationships remain candidate attributions; no image lifespan is assigned. The proposed Juan and María are not merged with the family documented around the 1503 marriage.
Record
Juan Rodríguez Pimentel · documentary comparison (2007)
Manuel Fernández del Hoyo, Los sepulcros del convento de Nuestra Señora del Valle: Identidad y patronato de un Pimentel oculto, Brigecio 17, 2007, pp. 117–133
Manuel Fernández del Hoyo, “Los sepulcros del convento de Nuestra Señora del Valle: Identidad y patronato de un Pimentel oculto”, Brigecio 17 (2007), pp. 117–133, especially pp. 120 and 124–125. The 1505 testament of Blanca Cabeza de Vaca’s husband names Juan Pimentel and Catalina de Porras as his parents (AHN Nobleza, Fernán Núñez, C.28 D.6). The study traces an older Juan Rodríguez, husband of Teresa Álvarez de la Somoza, to the first count of Benavente, not the second duke. The manuscripts cited by the study were not independently inspected.
Record
Enríquez ancestors · Salazar y Acha (2021)
Jaime de Salazar y Acha, Las dinastías reales de España en la Edad Media, RAH/BOE, 2021, printed pp. 280, 330–331, 334; notes 2496, 2883
Salazar y Acha, Las dinastías reales de España en la Edad Media, RAH/BOE, pp. 280, 330–331 and 334, supports the upper royal and Enríquez ancestry. Note 2883 leaves Alonso’s mother’s name unknown; note 2496 leaves Leonor de Guzmán’s mother unknown and treats Juana Ponce as a possibility. These qualifications remain alongside the reference-image candidates.
Record
Alonso Pimentel’s parents · official archive catalogue
Ministerio de Cultura, PARES, authority 47279, Pimentel Pacheco, Alonso (aprox. 1470–1530); indexed biographical description
The Spanish Ministry of Culture’s PARES authority 47279 identifies Alonso Pimentel Pacheco, second duke of Benavente, as son of Rodrigo Alfonso Pimentel, first duke, and María Pacheco Portocarrero. The indexed biographical description was checked; the underlying records were not read. Only its parentage is used here; inconsistent title numbering and descendant details are not adopted. The later junction to María married in 1503 remains disputed.
Record
Enríquez–Cadórniga ancestry · Cuadernos de Ayala 36 (2008)
Alfonso de Ceballos-Escalera Gila and Luis F. Cercós García, Los españoles en la Orden de San Esteban de Toscana (caballeros, pretendientes, falsarios), Cuadernos de Ayala 36 (October–December 2008), p. 18; citing Bruno Casini I, entry 78
The 1589 Mauro entry reports Ana Enríquez’s parents as Benito Enríquez and Berenguela de Cadórniga. It cites Bruno Casini I, entry 78, on San Esteban applicants. The original Pisa records were not inspected. Matching these parents of Mauro to Lamigueiro’s couple remains a candidate comparison.
Record
Paloma’s father · family correction
Paloma · Gedaliah ibn Yahya · 2026-10-25
The family identifies Gedaliah ibn Yahya as Paloma’s father. This supplied attribution is not independently established by the cited scholarly genealogy. No mother, life dates or earlier ancestors are supplied.
Record
Luis de Armada Pimentel · litigation, 1681
REGISTRO DE EJECUTORIAS,CAJA 3012,20
Partial readings, not a complete transcription or translation. The final merits outcome remains unresolved. Catalogue dates are separate from event dates; entries do not represent 40 uniquely identified people.