Regional families
Puga – Alvarez de Belmonte – Noboa – Enríquez
Transcribed from the three supplied Geni images. Fernando Enríquez and Leonor de Noboa Ambia recur within this source tree and are drawn as shared ancestors. The older Enríquez branch reaches Alonso Enríquez de Castilla, Infante Fadrique Alfonso and Paloma, displayed as Paloma ibn Yahya following the family correction naming Gedaliah ibn Yahya as her father. The parent links transcribed from Geni and the converso association retain candidate status. A separate royal continuation from Fadrique follows Salazar y Acha (RAH/BOE, 2021), with its own citations; it does not verify the Galician-to-royal descent. Shared royal ancestors are represented once. The unnamed N.N. mother is preserved, blank boxes are omitted, and truncated titles are not expanded. This regional tree has no assigned connection to our personal Álvarez pedigree. The earlier Puga ancestry is extended from the supplied 2011 compilation through the Vasco–María couple as a candidate cross-source match; the traditional first generations are not independently established. The corrected Belmonte generations and Antonia’s Puga parentage follow Rudesindus (2021). Inés’s descent from the earliest couple is probable. Beatriz’s parents and the identity of Pedro el Mozo with the Santafé treasurer remain unverified. The Colombian study independently names the treasurer’s Belmonte parents. Two Antonias are kept distinct. Royal ancestry and Portuguese continuation retain their source qualifications; this network does not establish converso ancestry or a connection to the personal family.
Explore
Regional research is separate from our own family tree. A common surname, trade or place does not establish kinship or religious status.
Family reconstruction
Transcribed from the three supplied Geni images. Fernando Enríquez and Leonor de Noboa Ambia recur within this source tree and are drawn as shared ancestors. The older Enríquez branch reaches Alonso Enríquez de Castilla, Infante Fadrique Alfonso and Paloma, displayed as Paloma ibn Yahya following the family correction naming Gedaliah ibn Yahya as her father. The parent links transcribed from Geni and the converso association retain candidate status. A separate royal continuation from Fadrique follows Salazar y Acha (RAH/BOE, 2021), with its own citations; it does not verify the Galician-to-royal descent. Shared royal ancestors are represented once. The unnamed N.N. mother is preserved, blank boxes are omitted, and truncated titles are not expanded. This regional tree has no assigned connection to our personal Álvarez pedigree. The earlier Puga ancestry is extended from the supplied 2011 compilation through the Vasco–María couple as a candidate cross-source match; the traditional first generations are not independently established. The corrected Belmonte generations and Antonia’s Puga parentage follow Rudesindus (2021). Inés’s descent from the earliest couple is probable. Beatriz’s parents and the identity of Pedro el Mozo with the Santafé treasurer remain unverified. The Colombian study independently names the treasurer’s Belmonte parents. Two Antonias are kept distinct. Royal ancestry and Portuguese continuation retain their source qualifications; this network does not establish converso ancestry or a connection to the personal family.
Claims & citations
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Fernando Álvarez de Belmonte as a parent of Pedro Enríquez de Nóboa.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Antonia Enríquez de Nóboa as a parent of Pedro Enríquez de Nóboa.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Pedro Álvarez de Belmonte as a parent of Fernando Álvarez de Belmonte.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Beatriz Enríquez as a parent of Fernando Álvarez de Belmonte.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Pero Vázquez de Puga as a parent of Antonia Enríquez de Nóboa.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Violante Enríquez de Nóboa as a parent of Antonia Enríquez de Nóboa.
The corrected tree follows Rudesindus (2021), p. 253: Inés Pérez de Belmonte and Alfonso de Saa are parents of Pedro el Joven. The older Geni links directly to Pedro el Viejo and Elvira González omit this generation and are retained only as superseded source readings. The study qualifies Inés’s own descent from the older couple as probable.
The corrected tree follows Rudesindus (2021), p. 253: Inés Pérez de Belmonte and Alfonso de Saa are parents of Pedro el Joven. The older Geni links directly to Pedro el Viejo and Elvira González omit this generation and are retained only as superseded source readings. The study qualifies Inés’s own descent from the older couple as probable.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Juan Fernández de Luaces as a parent of Beatriz Enríquez.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Leonor Enríquez de Nóboa as a parent of Beatriz Enríquez.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Gonzalo de Puga as a parent of Pero Vázquez de Puga.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Teresa de Nóboa as a parent of Pero Vázquez de Puga.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Enrique Enríquez de Nóboa as a parent of Violante Enríquez de Nóboa.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Violante de Mosquera as a parent of Violante Enríquez de Nóboa.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Alonso Enríquez as a parent of Leonor Enríquez de Nóboa.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Maria Enríquez Nuñez das Seijas as a parent of Leonor Enríquez de Nóboa.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Pedro Vázquez de Puga el Viejo as a parent of Gonzalo de Puga.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Guiomar Lorenzo de Temes as a parent of Gonzalo de Puga.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Juan Pérez de Nóboa Enríquez as a parent of Teresa de Nóboa.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Mencia López de Mosquera as a parent of Teresa de Nóboa.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Alonso Enríquez de Novoa as a parent of Enrique Enríquez de Nóboa.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows María Álvarez as a parent of Enrique Enríquez de Nóboa.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Eynes Rodrigues de San Juan as a parent of Violante de Mosquera.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Fernando Enríquez as a parent of Maria Enríquez Nuñez das Seijas.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Margarita Nuñez das Seijas as a parent of Maria Enríquez Nuñez das Seijas.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Vasco de Puga as a parent of Pedro Vázquez de Puga el Viejo.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows María Yáñez de Ulloa as a parent of Pedro Vázquez de Puga el Viejo.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Lorenzo de Temes as a parent of Guiomar Lorenzo de Temes.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Fernando Enríquez as a parent of Juan Pérez de Nóboa Enríquez.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Leonor de Noboa Ambia as a parent of Juan Pérez de Nóboa Enríquez.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Galaor de Mosquera Villar as a parent of Mencia López de Mosquera.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Ana do Campo Bahamonde as a parent of Mencia López de Mosquera.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Fernando Enríquez as a parent of Alonso Enríquez de Novoa.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Leonor de Noboa Ambia as a parent of Alonso Enríquez de Novoa.
His father is disputed: Salazar y Acha (2021), p. 336, assigns him to admiral Alonso; Rudesindus (2021), p. 257, leaves his father unnamed and calls him a grandson of infante Enrique. The displayed Alonso link remains contested. Rudesindus p. 263 calls Leonor’s husband Alfonso once, but its quoted will names Fernando. Fernando died before 15 April 1453.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows N.N. as a parent of Fernando Enríquez.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Infante Fadrique Alfonso as a parent of Alonso Enríquez de Castilla.
The supplied Geni pedigree shows Paloma ibn Yahya as a parent of Alonso Enríquez de Castilla.
The family research associates the Enríquez de Nóboa branches with converso ancestry; this is retained as a candidate historical attribution.
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Alfonso XI de Castilla as a parent of Infante Fadrique Alfonso.
Salazar y Acha gives Leonor de Guzmán as a parent of Infante Fadrique Alfonso.
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Fernando IV de Castilla as a parent of Rey Alfonso XI de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Constanza de Portugal as a parent of Rey Alfonso XI de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Pedro Núñez de Guzmán as a parent of Leonor de Guzmán.
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Sancho IV de Castilla as a parent of Rey Fernando IV de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives María de Molina as a parent of Rey Fernando IV de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Rei Dinis I de Portugal as a parent of Constanza de Portugal.
Salazar y Acha gives Isabel de Aragón as a parent of Constanza de Portugal.
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Alfonso X de Castilla as a parent of Rey Sancho IV de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Violante de Aragón as a parent of Rey Sancho IV de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Infante Alfonso de Molina as a parent of María de Molina.
Salazar y Acha gives Mayor Alfonso de Meneses as a parent of María de Molina.
Salazar y Acha gives Rei Afonso III de Portugal as a parent of Rei Dinis I de Portugal.
Salazar y Acha gives Beatriz Alfonso de Castilla as a parent of Rei Dinis I de Portugal.
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Pedro III de Aragón as a parent of Isabel de Aragón.
Salazar y Acha gives Constanza de Sicilia as a parent of Isabel de Aragón.
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Fernando III de Castilla as a parent of Rey Alfonso X de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Beatriz de Suabia as a parent of Rey Alfonso X de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Jaime I de Aragón as a parent of Violante de Aragón.
Salazar y Acha gives Violante de Hungría as a parent of Violante de Aragón.
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Alfonso IX de León as a parent of Infante Alfonso de Molina.
Salazar y Acha gives Reina Berenguela de Castilla as a parent of Infante Alfonso de Molina.
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Alfonso X de Castilla as a parent of Beatriz Alfonso de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Mayor Guillén de Guzmán as a parent of Beatriz Alfonso de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Jaime I de Aragón as a parent of Rey Pedro III de Aragón.
Salazar y Acha gives Violante de Hungría as a parent of Rey Pedro III de Aragón.
Salazar y Acha gives Rey Alfonso IX de León as a parent of Rey Fernando III de Castilla.
Salazar y Acha gives Reina Berenguela de Castilla as a parent of Rey Fernando III de Castilla.
Son of Alfonso XI and Leonor de Guzmán. Salazar y Acha (p. 330) gives 13 January 1332 and 29 May 1358; Mitre and González Crespo (p. 785) give 1334–1358. Birth is therefore shown as 1332 / 1334. The parents are added from the scholarly genealogy, not inferred from the Geni image.
Salazar y Acha (p. 334) identifies the admiral Alonso Enríquez as Fadrique’s son, born in 1354 and deceased in 1429. The supplied downstream Galician pedigree remains a separate candidate reconstruction.
She is displayed as Paloma ibn Yahya following the family correction. Salazar y Acha (p. 331, note 2883) discusses the Paloma tradition but says her name is unknown. That does not establish the full surname or parentage. The family identifies her father as Gedaliah ibn Yahya; this parentage remains a family attribution.
The compilation gives Vasco de Puga «Caballero Pugado» as a parent of Lope Vázquez de Puga.
The compilation gives Mencia López de Figueroa as a parent of Lope Vázquez de Puga.
The compilation gives Lope Vázquez de Puga as a parent of Pedro Vázquez de Puga.
The compilation gives Ana de Sotomayor as a parent of Pedro Vázquez de Puga.
The compilation gives Pedro Vázquez de Puga as a parent of Vasco de Puga «Caballero Levantado».
The compilation gives María Pérez de Novoa as a parent of Vasco de Puga «Caballero Levantado».
The compilation gives Pedro Yáñez de Ulloa as a parent of María Yáñez de Ulloa.
The compilation gives Pedro Vázquez de Puga el Viejo as a parent of Gonzalo de Puga.
The compilation gives Guiomar Lorenzo de Temes as a parent of Gonzalo de Puga.
The compilation gives Juan Pérez Yáñez de Novoa Enríquez as a parent of Teresa de Novoa.
The compilation gives Mencia López Mosquera as a parent of Teresa de Novoa.
The compilation gives Galor Mosquera as a parent of Mencia López Mosquera.
The compilation gives Ana Docampo as a parent of Mencia López Mosquera.
The compilation gives Gonzalo de Puga as a parent of Pedro Vázquez de Puga.
The compilation gives Teresa de Novoa as a parent of Pedro Vázquez de Puga.
The compilation gives Gonzalo de Puga as a parent of Antonio de Puga y Novoa.
The compilation gives Teresa de Novoa as a parent of Antonio de Puga y Novoa.
The compilation gives Gonzalo de Puga as a parent of Juan de Puga y Novoa.
The compilation gives Teresa de Novoa as a parent of Juan de Puga y Novoa.
The compilation gives Domingo Pérez as a parent of María Pérez de Bóveda.
The compilation gives Ana Bóveda as a parent of María Pérez de Bóveda.
The compilation gives Juan de Puga y Novoa as a parent of Juana de Puga y Bóveda.
The compilation gives María Pérez de Bóveda as a parent of Juana de Puga y Bóveda.
The compilation gives Juan de Puga y Novoa as a parent of Jacinto de Puga.
The compilation gives María Pérez de Bóveda as a parent of Jacinto de Puga.
The compilation gives Juan de Puga y Novoa as a parent of Leonor de Puga y Pérez de Bóveda.
The compilation gives María Pérez de Bóveda as a parent of Leonor de Puga y Pérez de Bóveda.
The compilation gives Violante Enríquez de Novoa as a parent of Mendo de Puga.
The compilation gives Pedro Vázquez de Puga as a parent of Enrique de Puga.
The compilation gives Violante Enríquez de Novoa as a parent of Enrique de Puga.
The compilation gives Diego Feijoo as a parent of Beatriz de Feijoo.
The compilation gives Mencia López de Puga as a parent of Beatriz de Feijoo.
The compilation gives Nuño González de Puga as a parent of Mencia López de Puga.
The compilation gives Enrique de Puga as a parent of Pedro Vázquez de Puga.
The compilation gives Beatriz de Feijoo as a parent of Pedro Vázquez de Puga.
The compilation gives Pedro Vázquez de Puga as a parent of Antonio de Puga Feijoo.
The compilation gives Inés Taboada Baamonde as a parent of Antonio de Puga Feijoo.
The compilation gives Antonio de Puga Feijoo as a parent of Felipe de Puga y Ulloa.
The compilation gives Úrsula de Ulloa as a parent of Felipe de Puga y Ulloa.
The compilation gives Antonio de Puga Feijoo as a parent of Ana María de Puga y Ulloa.
The compilation gives Úrsula de Ulloa as a parent of Ana María de Puga y Ulloa.
The compilation states a marriage between Vasco de Puga «Caballero Pugado» and Mencia López de Figueroa.
The compilation states a marriage between Lope Vázquez de Puga and Ana de Sotomayor.
The compilation states a marriage between Pedro Vázquez de Puga and María Pérez de Novoa.
The compilation states a marriage between Vasco de Puga «Caballero Levantado» and María Yáñez de Ulloa.
The compilation states a marriage between Pedro Vázquez de Puga el Viejo and Guiomar Lorenzo de Temes.
The compilation states a marriage between Juan Pérez Yáñez de Novoa Enríquez and Mencia López Mosquera.
The compilation states a marriage between Galor Mosquera and Ana Docampo.
The compilation states a marriage between Gonzalo Rodríguez Sotelo and Teresa de Novoa.
The compilation states a marriage between Gonzalo de Puga and Teresa de Novoa.
The compilation states a marriage between Domingo Pérez and Ana Bóveda.
The compilation states a marriage between Juan de Puga y Novoa and María Pérez de Bóveda.
The compilation states a marriage between Clemente de Cao Cordido and Juana de Puga y Bóveda.
The compilation states a marriage between Jacinto de Puga and Juana Álvarez Araújo.
The compilation states a marriage between Gregorio Salgado de Guntín and Leonor de Puga y Pérez de Bóveda.
The compilation states a marriage between Pedro Vázquez de Puga and Violante Enríquez de Novoa.
The compilation states a marriage between Diego Feijoo and Mencia López de Puga.
The compilation states a marriage between Enrique de Puga and Beatriz de Feijoo.
The compilation states a marriage between Pedro Vázquez de Puga and Inés Taboada Baamonde.
The compilation states a marriage between Antonio de Puga Feijoo and Úrsula de Ulloa.
The compilation states a marriage between Bernardino Feijoo Fajardo and Ana María de Puga y Ulloa.
Traditional early ancestry as related by the compilation; no life dates or independent primary proof supplied.
Traditional early ancestry as related by the compilation; no life dates or independent primary proof supplied.
The compilation repeats Pedro married to Violante under two incompatible parentages: Gonzalo / Teresa in line 2, and Gonzalo / Inés de Deza in Roucos. These source accounts are kept separate, with no automatic identity merge.
The compilation repeats Pedro married to Violante under two incompatible parentages: Gonzalo / Teresa in line 2, and Gonzalo / Inés de Deza in Roucos. These source accounts are kept separate, with no automatic identity merge.
Violante’s improvement to her son Mendo is dated 1559. Only her maternity is explicit in this clause; the contradictory Pedro accounts are not silently reconciled.
Named as a paternal grandson of Ana María and Bernardino. The intervening parent is unnamed; his 1709 hidalguía lawsuit is not a birth date.
The compilation explicitly names these people as siblings.
Enrique de Puga Feijoo Fajardo y Araujo / Ana María de Puga y Ulloa: The compilation names this relative but does not establish the intervening parent; no direct parent link is drawn.
Enrique de Puga Feijoo Fajardo y Araujo / Bernardino Feijoo Fajardo: The compilation names this relative but does not establish the intervening parent; no direct parent link is drawn.
Candidate match to the supplied Geni ancestry, based on the Vasco–María couple and their son Pedro el Viejo.
Candidate match to the supplied Geni ancestry, based on the Vasco–María couple and their son Pedro el Viejo.
The source reports the marriage of Pedro Álvarez de Belmonte el Viejo and Elvira González.
The source gives Pedro Álvarez de Belmonte el Viejo as a parent of Inés Pérez de Belmonte. The study presents Inés as the probable daughter of Pedro el Viejo and Elvira González (p. 253). This qualified link stays candidate; her marriage to Alfonso de Saa and their son Pedro el Joven are stated in the published genealogy.
The source gives Elvira González as a parent of Inés Pérez de Belmonte. The study presents Inés as the probable daughter of Pedro el Viejo and Elvira González (p. 253). This qualified link stays candidate; her marriage to Alfonso de Saa and their son Pedro el Joven are stated in the published genealogy.
The source reports the marriage of Inés Pérez de Belmonte and Alfonso de Saa.
The source gives Alfonso de Saa as a parent of Pedro Álvarez de Belmonte el Joven.
The source gives Inés Pérez de Belmonte as a parent of Pedro Álvarez de Belmonte el Joven.
The source reports the marriage of Gonzalo de Puga and Teresa de Nóboa.
The source gives Gonzalo de Puga as a parent of Pero Vázquez de Puga.
The source gives Teresa de Nóboa as a parent of Pero Vázquez de Puga.
The source reports the marriage of Enrique Enríquez de Nóboa and Violante de Mosquera.
The source gives Enrique Enríquez de Nóboa as a parent of Violante Enríquez de Nóboa.
The source gives Violante de Mosquera as a parent of Violante Enríquez de Nóboa.
The source reports the marriage of Pero Vázquez de Puga and Violante Enríquez de Nóboa.
The source gives Pero Vázquez de Puga as a parent of Antonia de Novoa.
The source gives Violante Enríquez de Nóboa as a parent of Antonia de Novoa.
The source gives Enrique Enríquez de Nóboa as a parent of Antonia de Novoa.
The source gives Violante de Mosquera as a parent of Antonia de Novoa.
The source reports the marriage of Antonia de Novoa and Rodrigo Díaz de Cadórniga. Rudesindus (2021), p. 263, names this Antonia as daughter of Enrique de Novoa and Violante Mosquera and wife of Rodrigo Díaz de Cadórniga. She is distinct from their granddaughter Antonia, wife of Fernando Álvarez Belmonte. The proposed 1539 wedding date is not assigned: that reference may concern another Antonia in the extended family.
The source reports the marriage of Pedro Álvarez de Belmonte el Joven and Beatriz Enríquez.
The source gives Pedro Álvarez de Belmonte el Joven as a parent of Fernando Álvarez de Belmonte.
The source gives Beatriz Enríquez as a parent of Fernando Álvarez de Belmonte.
The source gives Pedro Álvarez de Belmonte el Joven as a parent of Tristán Álvarez.
The source gives Beatriz Enríquez as a parent of Tristán Álvarez.
The source reports the marriage of Fernando Álvarez de Belmonte and María Jiménez.
The source reports the marriage of Fernando Álvarez de Belmonte and Antonia de Novoa.
The source gives Fernando Álvarez de Belmonte as a parent of Pedro Álvarez Belmonte.
The source gives María Jiménez as a parent of Pedro Álvarez Belmonte.
The source gives Fernando Álvarez de Belmonte as a parent of Inés Pérez de Belmonte.
The source gives María Jiménez as a parent of Inés Pérez de Belmonte.
The source gives Fernando Álvarez de Belmonte as a parent of Pedro Álvarez el Mozo.
The source gives Fernando Álvarez de Belmonte as a parent of Petronila Novoa Belmonte.
The source gives Antonia de Novoa as a parent of Pedro Álvarez el Mozo. The study explicitly names Antonia de Novoa as mother of Pedro el Mozo and Petronila (p. 253). Their maternal links follow that published genealogy.
The source gives Antonia de Novoa as a parent of Petronila Novoa Belmonte. The study explicitly names Antonia de Novoa as mother of Pedro el Mozo and Petronila (p. 253). Their maternal links follow that published genealogy.
The source reports the marriage of Inés Pérez de Belmonte and Roi Vázquez Enríquez.
The source reports the marriage of Inés Pérez de Belmonte and Diego de Oca.
The source reports the marriage of Petronila Novoa Belmonte and Francisco Soutelo.
The source reports the marriage of Nuño González Soutelo and María Rodríguez de Ambía.
The source gives Nuño González Soutelo as a parent of Francisco Soutelo.
The source gives María Rodríguez de Ambía as a parent of Francisco Soutelo.
The source gives Nuño González Soutelo as a parent of Gil Soutelo.
The source gives María Rodríguez de Ambía as a parent of Gil Soutelo.
The source gives Nuño González Soutelo as a parent of Marina Soutelo.
The source gives María Rodríguez de Ambía as a parent of Marina Soutelo.
The source reports the marriage of Marina Soutelo and Alonso Novoa Espinosa.
The source reports the marriage of Pedro Álvarez Belmonte and Catalina de Quirós Soutomaior.
The source gives Pedro Álvarez Belmonte as a parent of Alonso Álvarez Belmonte.
The source gives Catalina de Quirós Soutomaior as a parent of Alonso Álvarez Belmonte.
The source gives Pedro Álvarez Belmonte as a parent of Luis de Andrade.
The source gives Catalina de Quirós Soutomaior as a parent of Luis de Andrade.
The source gives Pedro Álvarez Belmonte as a parent of Pedro Bermúdez.
The source gives Catalina de Quirós Soutomaior as a parent of Pedro Bermúdez.
The source gives Pedro Álvarez Belmonte as a parent of Álvaro de Soutomaior.
The source gives Catalina de Quirós Soutomaior as a parent of Álvaro de Soutomaior.
The source gives Pedro Álvarez Belmonte as a parent of María de Quirós.
The source gives Catalina de Quirós Soutomaior as a parent of María de Quirós.
The source gives Pedro Álvarez Belmonte as a parent of Ana de Soutomaior.
The source gives Catalina de Quirós Soutomaior as a parent of Ana de Soutomaior.
The source reports the marriage of María de Quirós and Gil Soutelo.
The source reports the marriage of Alonso Álvarez Belmonte and Beatriz Feijóo y Puga.
The source gives Alonso Álvarez Belmonte as a parent of Pedro Belmonte Quirós.
The source gives Beatriz Feijóo y Puga as a parent of Pedro Belmonte Quirós.
The source gives Alonso Álvarez Belmonte as a parent of Fernando de Soutomaior Enríquez.
The source gives Beatriz Feijóo y Puga as a parent of Fernando de Soutomaior Enríquez.
The source gives Alonso Álvarez Belmonte as a parent of Baltasar Álvarez Belmonte.
The source gives Beatriz Feijóo y Puga as a parent of Baltasar Álvarez Belmonte.
The source reports the marriage of Fernando de Soutomaior Enríquez and Juana de Castro. Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
The source gives Fernando de Soutomaior Enríquez as a parent of Margarita Álvarez Soutomaior. Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
The source gives Juana de Castro as a parent of Margarita Álvarez Soutomaior. Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
The source reports the marriage of Margarita Álvarez Soutomaior and Ignacio da Rocha. Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
The source gives Ignacio da Rocha as a parent of Fernando Álvarez de Soutomaior y Enríquez. Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
The source gives Margarita Álvarez Soutomaior as a parent of Fernando Álvarez de Soutomaior y Enríquez. Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
The source reports the marriage of Fernando Álvarez de Soutomaior y Enríquez and Ana de Troncoso y Sotomayor. Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
The source reports the marriage of Fernando Álvarez de Soutomaior y Enríquez and Ana Sarmiento. Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
The source gives Fernando Álvarez de Soutomaior y Enríquez as a parent of Margarita Álvarez Soutomaior Troncoso. Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
The source gives Ana de Troncoso y Sotomayor as a parent of Margarita Álvarez Soutomaior Troncoso. Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
The source gives Fernando Álvarez de Soutomaior y Enríquez as a parent of Inés Álvarez Soutomaior. Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
The source gives Ana de Troncoso y Sotomayor as a parent of Inés Álvarez Soutomaior. Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
The source gives Fernando Álvarez de Belmonte as a parent of Pedro Enríquez de Nóboa.
The source gives Antonia de Novoa as a parent of Pedro Enríquez de Nóboa.
The source reports the marriage of Pedro Enríquez de Nóboa and Sebastiana López de Mera.
The source reports the marriage of Fernando Enríquez and Leonor de Noboa Ambia.
The source gives Pedro Enríquez de Nóboa as a parent of Fernando Enríquez de Novoa.
The source gives Sebastiana López de Mera as a parent of Fernando Enríquez de Novoa.
The source reports the marriage of Fernando Enríquez de Novoa and Francisca de Ponce de León.
The source gives Fernando Enríquez de Novoa as a parent of Isabel Enríquez de Novoa.
The source gives Francisca de Ponce de León as a parent of Isabel Enríquez de Novoa.
The source reports the marriage of Isabel Enríquez de Novoa and Ambrosio Gómez de la Asprilla.
The source gives Juan López Delgado de Mera as a parent of Sebastiana López de Mera. BHA 878 (2024), p. 194, names Sebastiana’s parents as Juan López Delgado and Mariana de Grajeda. The addition “de Mera” in her father’s displayed name comes from the supplied brief and is not confirmed by the article. This is published genealogical support; the underlying original records were not inspected.
The source gives Mariana de Grajeda as a parent of Sebastiana López de Mera. BHA 878 (2024), p. 194, names Sebastiana’s parents as Juan López Delgado and Mariana de Grajeda. The addition “de Mera” in her father’s displayed name comes from the supplied brief and is not confirmed by the article. This is published genealogical support; the underlying original records were not inspected.
The source gives Alonso de Grajeda as a parent of Mariana de Grajeda.
The source gives María Antonia Jiménez as a parent of Mariana de Grajeda.
The source reports the marriage of Juan López Delgado de Mera and Mariana de Grajeda.
The source reports the marriage of Alonso de Grajeda and María Antonia Jiménez.
Candidate comparison of Pedro Vázquez de Puga el Viejo with Pedro Vázquez de Puga el Viejo in another source; both occurrences are retained and their identity is not assumed.
Candidate comparison of Guiomar Lorenzo de Temes with Guiomar Lorenzo de Temes in another source; both occurrences are retained and their identity is not assumed.
Candidate comparison of Gonzalo de Puga with Gonzalo de Puga in another source; both occurrences are retained and their identity is not assumed.
Candidate comparison of Teresa de Nóboa with Teresa de Novoa in another source; both occurrences are retained and their identity is not assumed.
Candidate comparison of Pero Vázquez de Puga with Pedro Vázquez de Puga in another source; both occurrences are retained and their identity is not assumed.
Candidate comparison of Violante Enríquez de Nóboa with Violante Enríquez de Novoa in another source; both occurrences are retained and their identity is not assumed.
Francisco’s marriage to Petronila is reported in the Belmonte and Soutelo household accounts. The supplied reconstruction had death about 1612; the indexed Soutelo account instead gives death between 1594 and 1600. The conflicting dates remain unresolved and no single death date is displayed.
The supplied brief links a forum discussion of a dowry granted by Fernando on 5 February 1524 for his sister Iseo’s marriage to Pedro Díaz de Cadórniga, identifying Fernando as legitimate son and heir of Pedro Álvarez de Belmonte and Beatriz Enríquez. The original deed and archival locator have not been verified. This is retained as a research lead alongside the published succession.
Salazar y Acha (2021), p. 336, supports Fernando Enríquez’s marriage to Leonor de Novoa before 1435 and places him among the admiral Alonso Enríquez’s children. Rudesindus (2021), p. 257, instead gives an unnamed father and descent from infante Enrique. The marriage is supported, but these upstream ancestries conflict. Neither establishes the entire Geni royal or converso descent.
Rudesindus (2021), pp. 244 and 253, names Antonia de Novoa as the daughter of Pedro Vázquez de Puga and Violante Enríquez and wife of Fernán/Fernando Álvarez Belmonte. This supports the Puga–Belmonte link as published genealogy. Antonia Enríquez de Novoa is the name used in the Colombian account. She is distinct from the Antonia, daughter of Enrique de Novoa and Violante Mosquera, who married Rodrigo Díaz de Cadórniga (p. 263).
Gonzalo’s death year conflicts: the 2011 Puga compilation gives 1512; Rudesindus (2021), p. 242, gives 1514 and identifies 1512 as the chapel foundation date. No single death year is displayed. Cross-source identity with the compilation occurrence remains a candidate.
Quintero Guzmán (BHA 878, 2024, p. 194) names Hernando Álvarez de Belmonte and second wife Antonia Enríquez de Novoa as his parents, and Sebastiana de Mera as his wife. Treasury service was 1590–1607 and 1618–1629, with a suspension between. BHA 700 (1973), p. 224, reports death on 3 July 1632 and marriage in 1584; the commercial compilation gives 1594. The wedding year and identification with Pedro Álvarez el Mozo remain unresolved. The c. 1545 birth year is only a Geni estimate.
Quintero Guzmán gives conflicting parentage for Isabel, wife of Ambrosio Gómez de la Asprilla. BHA 878 (2024), pp. 193–194, names Fernando Enríquez de Novoa and Francisca de Guzmán; BHA 700 (1973), pp. 223–224, instead names Pedro Henríquez de Novoa and María Quadrado Solanilla. The commercial genealogy uses Francisca de Ponce de León. These parentage and name differences remain unresolved; the existing source claims are retained without merging further people.
The study reports departure for the Indies around 1581. Identification with Pedro Enríquez de Novoa in New Granada is unresolved; he also remains distinct from the fifth lord Pedro.
Wife of Alonso, sixth lord. The study records her alive in 1608, not dead in that year. Her ancestry in the Torre de Puga family is not established. She is not merged with Enrique de Puga’s wife Beatriz de Feijóo.
The supplied outline makes Leonor a daughter of Juan Fernández de Luaces and Elvira González. The existing tree instead makes Juan her spouse and gives Alonso Enríquez and María Enríquez Núñez das Seijas as her parents; Elvira is paired with Pedro Álvarez. The conflicting outline is recorded as disputed, without replacing those people or edges.
The corrected tree follows Rudesindus (2021), p. 253: Inés Pérez de Belmonte and Alfonso de Saa are parents of Pedro el Joven. The older Geni links directly to Pedro el Viejo and Elvira González omit this generation and are retained only as superseded source readings. The study qualifies Inés’s own descent from the older couple as probable.
Juan Fernández de Luaces and Leonor Enríquez de Novoa remain unverified Geni parent proposals. Rudesindus (2021), p. 253, places Beatriz in the Maceda/Armariz family context and suggests a close relationship to canon Liondes Enríquez, but does not establish her parents. It records her alive after 1528.
Research lead: Archivo de la Real Chancillería de Valladolid, REGISTRO DE EJECUTORIAS, CAJA 266,25 (1511), named in the brief. Neither the catalogue entry nor the original has been inspected for this reconstruction; it does not establish identity or parentage.
The brief associates the couple with a tower at Louredo around 1430. Louredo is not equated with Torre de Puga in Toén; the reported date and building attribution need verification.
Portuguese continuation reported by the study, whose authors explicitly say that this genealogy was not fully verified. These links remain candidates.
Gedaliah ibn Yahya is identified as Paloma’s father in the family correction.
Geneall names María Enríquez Núñez das Seijas as his wife and Leonor Enríquez de Novoa as their daughter. His public profile displays no parents.
Pedro Yáñez de Novoa is named as a parent of Leonor de Novoa.
Guiomar Méndez de Ambía is named as a parent of Leonor de Novoa.
Fernando Enríquez is named as a parent of Juan de Novoa.
Leonor de Novoa is named as a parent of Juan de Novoa.
Fernando Enríquez is named as a parent of Alonso Enríquez de Novoa.
Leonor de Novoa is named as a parent of Alonso Enríquez de Novoa.
Juan de Novoa is named as a parent of Teresa de Novoa.
Mencía López Mosquera is named as a parent of Teresa de Novoa.
Alonso Enríquez de Novoa is named as a parent of Enrique de Novoa.
María Álvarez is named as a parent of Enrique de Novoa.
Luis de Villamarín is named as a parent of Suero de Villamarín.
Leonor de Novoa is named as a parent of Suero de Villamarín.
Marriage of Pedro Yáñez de Novoa and Guiomar Méndez de Ambía.
Marriage of Juan de Novoa and Mencía López Mosquera.
Marriage of Alonso Enríquez de Novoa and María Álvarez.
Teresa de Novoa’s second marriage was to Gonzalo de Puga.
Teresa de Novoa’s first marriage was to Gonzalo Rodríguez Soutelo / Sotelo.
Leonor de Novoa’s first marriage was to Luis de Villamarín.
Marriage of Fernando Enríquez and Margarita Núñez das Seijas.
The early Maceda succession is collateral: Leonor Enríquez de Castro, daughter of Pedro Enríquez de Castilla, married an earlier Juan Pérez de Novoa (testament 1406). Maceda passed to Juan’s brother Pedro Yáñez de Novoa. The study qualifies this early genealogy; succession alone establishes no descent from Leonor de Castro to Teresa de Novoa.
Record
Geni genealogy · Puga, Belmonte, Noboa and Enríquez
Geni family tree 6000000175860729822 · three family-supplied images · 22 October 2026
Three family-supplied Geni pedigree images, reviewed on 22 October 2026, including the expanded Enríquez and Puga branches. The online viewer required a security check and was not inspected beyond the supplied images. Parent links are candidate genealogy claims; blank boxes and hidden branches are not reconstructed.
Record
Royal genealogy · Salazar y Acha (2021)
Jaime de Salazar y Acha, Las dinastías reales de España en la Edad Media, RAH/BOE, Madrid, 2021, ISBN 978-84-340-2781-7
Jaime de Salazar y Acha, Las dinastías reales de España en la Edad Media, RAH/BOE, 2021. Relevant genealogies and footnotes were reviewed in chapters VII, X and XI. This supports the added royal ancestry from Fadrique; it does not independently verify the supplied Geni links back from the Galician family. Leonor’s mother is not established. Paloma’s full identity is not established by this book.
Record
Fadrique and his descendants · Mitre and González Crespo (2016)
Emilio Mitre Fernández & Esther González Crespo, El maestre D. Fadrique y su descendencia en la formación de la nobleza trastamarista, Hidalguía 373 (2016), pp. 779–808; birth-year comparison at p. 785
Emilio Mitre Fernández and Esther González Crespo, Hidalguía 373 (2016), pp. 779–808. Page 785 lists Fadrique as 1334–1358; Salazar y Acha gives 1332–1358. The conflicting birth years are retained rather than selecting one as certain.
Record
Puga lineages · genealogy compilation (2011)
“Linajes y genealogía de Puga”, Puga: un apellido toponímico, 23 noviembre 2011 · family-supplied text, reviewed 23 October 2026
Family-supplied text matched to “Linajes y genealogía de Puga”, Puga: un apellido toponímico, 23 November 2011. The compilation cites a general bibliography, including Crespo Pozo and Portuguese nobiliaries, without locators for individual relationships. Those underlying records were not independently reviewed for this import. All imported relationships are candidate genealogy; conflicting accounts, traditional origins and incomplete grandparent links are qualified.
Record
New Granada genealogy · Quintero Guzmán (2024)
Miguel Wenceslao Quintero Guzmán, “La ascendencia de Camilo Torres y Francisco José de Caldas”, Boletín de Historia y Antigüedades CXI, 878 (2024), pp. 181–215
Boletín de Historia y Antigüedades 878 (2024), pp. 181–215; relevant pp. 193–194 and notes 51–57 inspected. Supports the treasurer’s parents, marriage and interrupted service. Cites Flórez de Ocáriz, Libro Segundo, p. 98, and Sebastiana’s will, AGN, Colonia, Notaría Primera de Santafé, 1652, f. 527r. These underlying originals were not inspected; the article does not establish the Pedro el Mozo alias.
Record
Gómez de la Asprilla · Quintero Guzmán (1973)
Miguel Wenceslao Quintero Guzmán, “Gómez de la Asprilla”, Boletín de Historia y Antigüedades LX, 700 (1973), pp. 223–231
Boletín de Historia y Antigüedades 700 (1973), pp. 223–231, especially p. 224. Reports Pedro’s Belmonte parents, death on 3 July 1632 and marriage in 1584. The commercial genealogy gives 1594. Downstream Isabel parentage differs between accounts and is not reconciled by this review.
Record
Belmonte–Puga–Novoa · supplied research brief (2026)
Genealogical Reconstruction: Álvarez de Belmonte – Puga – Enríquez de Novoa · supplied 24 October 2026
User-supplied reconstruction brief reviewed on 24 October 2026. It is a research guide, not an original record. Claims supported only by this brief remain candidates or unresolved readings.
Record
Belmonte succession · Pérez Formoso & Leza Tello (2021)
Pilar Pérez Formoso & Prudencio Leza Tello, “Apuntes para la historia del convento y comunidad de san Francisco de Ourense (II)”, Rudesindus 14 (2021), pp. 225–328
Published study: Rudesindus 14 (2021), pp. 225–328. Indexed excerpts of the Soutelo/Xocín household and pp. 242, 244, 253–255, 257, 263 and 271 were inspected; the PDF and cited original deeds were not fully inspected. The authors explicitly qualify the Portuguese continuation as not fully verified. A published transcription is not independent inspection of an original deed.
Record
Enríquez de Novoa · published genealogy
Heráldica de Apellidos · Enríquez de Novoa · “Los que pasaron al Nuevo Reino de Granada”
Commercial heraldic/genealogical website, section “Los que pasaron al Nuevo Reino de Granada”, inspected on 24 October 2026. It cites Restrepo Sáenz–Rivas, Genealogía de Santafé de Bogotá, manuscript no. 151-bis. That manuscript was not inspected. The page supports Pedro’s family and offices, not Sebastiana’s proposed Mera–Grajeda ancestry.
Record
1524 dowry · genealogy forum reference
Foros Xenealoxía · topic 5576, start=100 · 1524 dowry reference supplied by the family
Forum reference supplied in the research brief: the reported deed of 5 February 1524 granted by Fernando for his sister Iseo’s marriage to Pedro Díaz de Cadórniga. The original deed and its archival location remain to be established. This forum reference does not turn the relationship into primary documentary proof.
Record
Paloma’s father · family correction
Paloma · Gedaliah ibn Yahya · 2026-10-25
The family identifies Gedaliah ibn Yahya as Paloma’s father. This supplied attribution is not independently established by the cited scholarly genealogy. No mother, life dates or earlier ancestors are supplied.
Record
Geneall · Fernando Enríquez of Allariz and Celanova
Geneall · Fernando Enríquez, señor de Allariz y Celanova · 1193693
Online genealogy, profile 1193693, reviewed 26 October 2026. It assigns Fernando to Alfonso Enríquez and an unidentified mother and reports Margarita Núñez das Seijas and Leonor de Novoa as wives. Its individual claims remain candidates; the conflicting scholarly paternal accounts are retained.
Record
Geneall · Alonso Enríquez, María das Seijas’s husband
Geneall · Alonso Enríquez · 1307702
Public profile inspected in the browser on 26 October 2026. Names his wife and daughter but displays no parents. Detailed ancestry requires Geneall Plus and was not accessed. This online genealogy is not documentary proof.