Later defence question 11 calls Antonio Pereyra the son-in-law of Pedro F[ernández?] and Inés [Rodríguez?]. Charge 6 states the same relationship with names left unread.
GaliciaResearch
Inés [Rodríguez?]
Later defence question 11 names her with Pedro F[ernández?] as reconciled parents-in-law of Antonio Pereyra. Her surname reading is uncertain; other secondary lists give a different wife.
Explore
Source occurrence
Inés [Rodríguez?]
Explore names on the mapRole in this source: Mentioned in the source
Later defence question 11 names her with Pedro F[ernández?] as reconciled parents-in-law of Antonio Pereyra. Her surname reading is uncertain; other secondary lists give a different wife.
Claims & citations
Later defence question 11 names Pedro F[ernández?] and Inés [Rodríguez?] together as Antonio Pereyra’s parents-in-law; charge 6 calls the woman his su muger.
Charge 6 says the parents-in-law were imprisoned as judayçantes and reconciled; charge 36 and question 11 call them reconciliados. These are the source’s procedural classifications.
Later question 11 names Inés [Rodríguez?] with Pedro F[ernández?] as Pereyra’s parents-in-law, making his wife her daughter.
Record
Pedro de la Cámara · criminal case
AHN, INQUISICIÓN,2143,Exp.6 · 1611
Partial case. 103 original viewer images acquired; selected passages reviewed. The catalogue describes 204 leaves and the viewer contains 428 images: these are different units. Final judgment unread.