Charge 36 calls Antonio Pereyra the son-in-law (yerno) of P[edro] F[ernández] el viejo, reconciliado. Later defence question 11 repeats the relationship. A charge and a proposed question are not witness answers.
GaliciaResearch
P[edro] F[ernández] el viejo
Charge 36 names Antonio Pereyra as his son-in-law and calls him reconciliado. Later defence question 11 names him with Inés [Rodríguez?]. Kept separate from every other Pedro Fernández in this archive.
Explore
Source occurrence
P[edro] F[ernández] el viejo
Explore names on the mapRole in this source: Mentioned in the source
Charge 36 names Antonio Pereyra as his son-in-law and calls him reconciliado. Later defence question 11 names him with Inés [Rodríguez?]. Kept separate from every other Pedro Fernández in this archive.
Claims & citations
Later defence question 11 names Pedro F[ernández?] and Inés [Rodríguez?] together as Antonio Pereyra’s parents-in-law; charge 6 calls the woman his su muger.
Charge 6 says the parents-in-law were imprisoned as judayçantes and reconciled; charge 36 and question 11 call them reconciliados. These are the source’s procedural classifications.
A son-in-law is a daughter’s husband: charge 36 and later question 11 therefore make Antonio Pereyra’s wife a daughter of Pedro Fernández el viejo.
Both sources name a reconciled Pedro Fernández el viejo as Antonio Pereyra’s father-in-law. The sources disagree on his wife.
Record
Pedro de la Cámara · criminal case
AHN, INQUISICIÓN,2143,Exp.6 · 1611
Partial case. 103 original viewer images acquired; selected passages reviewed. The catalogue describes 204 leaves and the viewer contains 428 images: these are different units. Final judgment unread.